If you work with data today, you’ve probably felt this tension:
your organisation is collecting more information than ever, but actually turning it into insight still feels slow, fragile, and expensive.​

Dashboards take ages to refresh. New data sources are painful to add. Real‑time use cases always seem to be “phase two” that never quite arrives. Meanwhile, the expectations keep rising.

This is where big data architectures come in—not as buzzwords, but as practical ways to make sense of the mess.​

In this post, we’re going to walk through the key patterns Microsoft highlights—Lambda, Kappa, Lakehouse, and IoT‑centric designs—and translate them into real‑world stories you can recognise in your own organisation.​

Why big data architecture matters now

The old world assumed your data could fit in a handful of traditional databases, refreshed overnight, and queried calmly the next morning. Today, reality looks different:​

• Your web and mobile apps emit clickstreams 24/7.

• Devices and sensors push events continuously.

• Historical logs, files, and decades of records still need to be kept and analysed.

At some point, the problem stops being “where do I store this?” and becomes “how do I ingest, process, and analyse all of this fast enough to be useful?”.​

That’s what big data architectures are designed to solve.

The core building blocks (without the jargon)

Most big data architectures—no matter how complex they look on a slide—are variations of the same idea:​

• Data sources: Apps, databases, logs, devices, external feeds—anything that produces data.

• Data storage: A place big enough and flexible enough to keep large, varied files (your data lake or lakehouse).​

• Batch processing: Heavy lifting done in chunks—perfect for large historical data, complex transforms, and training machine learning models.​

• Real‑time ingestion & stream processing: Capturing events as they happen and reacting quickly—ideal for alerts, monitoring, and low‑latency insights.​

• Analytical data store: A structured, query‑friendly layer where BI tools and analysts run their reports and models.​

• Analytics, reporting & ML: The actual “why we’re doing this”—dashboards, notebooks, data science, and applications that use the data.​

• Orchestration: The glue that automates all the pipelines and workflows so this doesn’t rely on manual effort.​

Different architectures simply wire these pieces together in different ways to balance speed, accuracy, cost, and complexity.

Lambda architecture: the “hot and cold lanes” of your data highway

Imagine you run a logistics business. Trucks send updates every few seconds, and management wants to see issues in near real time, but also understand trends over months or years.

Running every query over all historical data, all the time, would be painfully slow. That’s the problem Lambda architecture is built to solve.​

Lambda creates two paths for your data:

• Cold path (batch layer):

  • Stores all incoming data in raw form.

  • Runs heavy, long‑running batch jobs (think hours) to create highly accurate views.​

• Hot path (speed layer):

  • Processes streams in real time, with a strong focus on low latency.

  • Sacrifices some accuracy for speed.​

On top, you have a serving layer that combines batch and real‑time results so your users can choose:
“Do I need now, or do I need precise?”.​

This pattern shines when you:

• Need real‑time views but can’t afford to recompute everything instantly.

• Have a lot of historical data that matters for deeper analysis.

The trade‑off: You maintain two processing paths and have to keep their logic in sync, which adds complexity.​

Kappa architecture: one stream to rule them all

Teams that get far enough with Lambda often hit the same frustration:
“Why are we maintaining the same logic twice?”

That’s what Kappa architecture tries to fix.​

In Kappa, instead of having separate batch and speed layers, you treat everything as a stream:

• All events are appended to an ordered, immutable log.

• All processing happens through one streaming pipeline.

• If you need to recompute history, you replay the stream from storage.​

You still keep your raw data so you can:

• Rebuild views if business logic changes.

• Train or retrain machine learning models on full history.​

Kappa works best when:

• Your use cases are naturally event‑driven.

• You want to simplify operations and reduce duplicated logic.

The downside: you’re betting fully on streaming tools and approaches, which can be a shift for teams used to batch‑first thinking.​

Lakehouse architecture: bringing order to the lake

Many organisations have lived through the “data lake” era:
cheap storage, flexible formats… and then, over time, a data swamp—where nobody knows what’s in there or whether they can trust it.​

Separately, they also know the traditional data warehouse world: clean, structured, governed, but harder to adapt and often more expensive.​

The Lakehouse architecture tries to combine the best of both:​

• Store both raw and prepared data in low‑cost, open formats.

• Keep schema and governance on top so data is discoverable and trustworthy.

• Support both large‑scale analytics and reporting from one platform.​

In practice, this means:

• You don’t have to constantly copy data between “lake” and “warehouse.”

• Data engineers, analysts, and data scientists can work off a shared foundation.

This pattern fits organisations that want:

• A single, unified platform for both historical and near real‑time analysis.

• Strong governance and lineage without giving up flexibility.​

For many modern teams, the lakehouse becomes the center of gravity for their big data strategy.

IoT architecture: when the world itself is your data source

Now imagine your data doesn’t come from apps or databases, but from thousands of devices out in the world: machines, vehicles, sensors, wearables.​

That’s the reality of IoT architectures, where events arrive continuously, often with constraints like limited connectivity, intermittent networks, and huge volumes.​

A typical IoT‑style big data architecture includes:​

• Devices and field gateways:

  • Devices send events either directly to the cloud or via a local gateway that aggregates, filters, or transforms data.

• Cloud gateway:

  • A highly scalable entry point that ingests events at the edge of your cloud.

• Stream processing:

  • Real‑time analysis to detect anomalies, trigger alerts, and feed live dashboards.

• Cold storage and batch analytics:

  • Long‑term storage for historical analysis, reporting, and ML model training.

• Supporting services:

  • Device registry, provisioning, command‑and‑control for sending instructions back to devices.​

This pattern matters when your business relies on physical assets, environments, or devices—and you need to move from reactive to predictive behaviour.

Where machine learning fits in all of this

Across Lambda, Kappa, Lakehouse, and IoT, one theme repeats: machine learning becomes much more powerful when the architecture is right.​

• In Lambda and Kappa, you have historical and streaming data:

  • Perfect for training models on history and then scoring events as they arrive.​

• In Lakehouse, data scientists can work with both raw and curated data in one place, without endless copying.​

• In IoT, models can run at the edge and in the cloud for predictive maintenance, anomaly detection, and intelligent automation.​

Done well, architecture turns ML from isolated experiments into part of your daily operations.

How to choose the right pattern for your organisation

You don’t pick an architecture because it’s trendy.
You pick it because it fits your problems, constraints, and ambitions.

Ask yourself:

• Do we need real‑time insights, or is “near real‑time + strong history” enough?

• How complex are our data sources—mostly apps and databases, or also devices and sensors?

• How important is governance and trust vs rapid experimentation right now?

• How mature is our data team with streaming tools, big data processing, and cloud platforms?

Some rough guidance:

• Start with Lakehouse if you want a unified, governable platform and have a mix of structured and unstructured data.

• Add Lambda or Kappa patterns when real‑time or low‑latency scenarios become central.

• Apply IoT architecture patterns if physical devices and event streams are core to your business model.​

You can—and often will—blend these patterns over time.

Conclusion

Big data architectures can look intimidating in documentation and reference diagrams. But at their core, they’re just structured answers to very human questions:

• How do we stop drowning in data and start using it?

• How do we give the right people the right insight at the right time?

• How do we build something that still makes sense in three years, not just three months?

If your current setup feels more like a tangle of pipelines than a coherent system, you’re not alone.
The good news is you don’t have to solve everything at once.

Pick one pattern that fits your biggest pain today.
Implement it well.
Then build from there.

That’s how you move from data chaos to clarity—one deliberate architecture choice at a time.

If you’re rethinking your own data architecture and want a second pair of eyes, I’d be happy to help. Fill out the form below and share a bit about your current setup, your biggest bottleneck, and where you want to be 12–24 months from now.

Once you submit, someone from our team will review your details and get back to you with practical next steps—not a generic pitch.

By submitting this form, you agree to receive access to the requested content and relevant communications from Onyx Data.

Your information will be handled in accordance with GDPR and CCPA regulations. You may update your preferences or opt out at any time.

View our Privacy Policy.